|
Affinity, Reality and Communication
A Blog About my Views and Scientology Activities |
 Blog For Free! Archives Home 2008 February 2007 October 2007 July 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2006 September My Links Scientology News David Miscavige - Official Bio Chairman of the Board Religious Technology Center Religious Technology Center CCHR Official Scientology Site Scientology Handbook Scientology Effective Solutions David Miscavige Interview on Scientology Truth About Drugs Volunteer Ministers Scientology Against Drugs Scientology Answers tBlog My Profile Send tMail My tFriends My Images Sponsored Blog 
|
posted by: International Post OTIII Day (reply) post date: 12.05.08 (4:09 pm) The following is the sacred document in Scientology known as OTIII. Scientologists deny it exists as part of their Operating Thetan literature. It was written by L. Ron Hubbard in 1967. Hubbard wrote that if you read this document before you have achieved a level of scholarship, you will get pneumonia and die. The cost to get to that level: $360,000. “The head of the Galactic Confederation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 yrs ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet -- 178 billion on average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H Bomb on the principal volcanoes (Incident 2) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic Area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged." His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc. was placed in the implants. When through with his crime (R/)Loyal Officers (to the people) captured him after 6 years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confed.)has since been a desert.” - Hubbard See it in his original handwriting at xenu dot net. Learn more about the fight against the criminal cult of Scientology on whyweprotest dot net. Make a difference by copy-pasting this and posting it somewhere else as part of International Post OTIII Day and in honor of Lisa McPherson, who died on Dec 5 1995 after being starved to death by Scientologists. posted by: kindasceptical (reply) post date: 04.21.09 (11:08 pm) This ARC triangle theory doesn't seem to totally apply. A person can be alone, yet their emotions, or 'affinity', for the objects around them is still present, even though there is no communication between 'terminals'. The same applies for the 'reality' aspect of the triangle. There may not be communication between 'terminals', but everything is still 'real'. Yes, all three aspects of the triangle are important, and all are related. But not to the point where if one 'corner' is missing then the other two cannot exist. It seems that this theory is a lump of several basic human behavioural theories that has simply been modified slightly to overstate the importance of the three as a whole. For instance, are you implying that those who have suffered damage to certain parts of their brain which causes a lack of emotion, such as Phineas Gage, are unable to communicate, and that their lives are not, in fact, a reality? While they may have difficulty in social situations, and may make mistakes in judgement as they are unable to use their emotions -and- their reason to guide them, it cannot be said that they cannot effectively communicate ideas, or that the way they perceive things isnt real. Reality is relative to those who are experiencing it. His reality may have been different to yours, but that doesnt make it any less of a reality, even though he had no emotion. Looking forwards to a reply. p.s. that OTIII thing doesnt make any sense... posted by: Louis (reply) post date: 06.22.09 (7:05 am) I think what's being said is that reality, communication and affinity rises and falls correspondingly. If you have no communication with something then it does become less real over time (or the reality is changed depending on your memory's accuracy). Likewise an affinity will not vanish if you're out of comm with someone or some thing, but it will become less and less until a good comm line is cultivated. Reality may be relative, but a shared reality depends on one's ability to communicate it to another person. In other words I think one's memory will keep reality and affinity alive, but it will be attenuated, usually proportional to time. |
|
